DOJ Warns Staff Binance to End Courtesy Freezes, Require MLATs From June 8

The U.S. Department of Justice has warned internal staff that Binance’s cooperation on crypto-related investigations will narrow starting June 8, according to a report cited by Coinotag. The guidance signals that Binance plans to stop issuing so-called courtesy freezes on flagged accounts and will instead require formal Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) requests before acting on law enforcement inquiries.

Binance has disputed the characterization, stating it has not changed its policies for cooperating with U.S. law enforcement. The exchange’s denial leaves a gap between what DOJ personnel were reportedly told internally and Binance’s public position, with no independent confirmation yet available on which account is accurate.

Why the freeze mechanism matters for on-chain tracing

Courtesy freezes have functioned as a fast-lane tool: exchanges voluntarily lock flagged funds at the request of investigators, often before a formal legal process concludes. For traders and forensic analysts tracking stolen or sanctioned funds on-chain, this mechanism has historically shortened the window between detection and asset containment on centralized rails.

MLAT requests, by contrast, route through formal bilateral treaty channels between governments and can take weeks or months to process. If Binance moves exclusively to this framework, the practical effect for on-chain researchers is a longer lag between when illicit flows are identified and when the receiving exchange can act on them — a gap that bad actors can exploit to move funds further before any freeze takes effect.

Positioning implications for compliance-sensitive flows

For desks and funds that route through Binance liquidity, the reported shift raises questions about counterparty risk tied to enforcement timelines rather than balance sheet risk. A slower freeze mechanism could mean funds tied to ongoing investigations remain liquid and tradeable for longer periods before formal legal action locks them, altering the risk calculus for market participants monitoring flagged wallets.

It also has implications for exchanges and forensic firms that rely on rapid inter-exchange freeze requests to contain exploit proceeds or sanctioned transfers. If the largest exchange by volume tightens the informal cooperation channel, downstream venues receiving funds from Binance may see a longer runway before parallel freezes materialize elsewhere in the flow.

Unresolved details

The source report does not specify which DOJ division issued the internal warning, nor does it detail whether the policy change — if real — would apply globally or only to specific jurisdictions or case types. Binance’s denial adds further uncertainty, and no court filings or official DOJ statement have been referenced to corroborate the internal guidance.

Until either side provides documentation, the practical impact on active cases and on-chain asset recovery timelines remains speculative. Traders and analysts tracking exchange-linked freezes should watch for confirmation from DOJ filings or Binance’s own compliance disclosures in the coming weeks.

Read more: Payward Collects $22M Arbitration Award Over Mazars’ Abandoned Kraken Audit